Hindsight

For Teams building GTM AI

A verified, AI-ready layer on top of your GTM data.

So your agents reason over what actually happened — in a harness that works - not raw transcripts and stale CRM fields.

The hardest part of building a GTM platform isn't the model or the workflows. It's the data underneath it.

01

Fragmented

One deal lives across calls, emails, CRM notes, and docs. Never in one place and up-to-date.

SalesforceGongOutreach
02

Unreliable

CRM fields are incomplete or inaccurate; transcripts are noisy and contradictory.

SalesforceGongOutreach
03

Difficult to Search

None of your tools offer the search harness an agent actually needs — you have to build it.

SalesforceGongOutreach
Claude?

Sources in. One verified record per deal. Queryable by anything.

01 · The Pipeline

CRM
SalesforceHubSpot
Context sources
GongGmailSlackClariOutreach
Interviews
buyer win-loss calls
Snowflake & API
warehouse · API / webhooks

02 · The Engine

Analyze

Reconciles every source into one record, then scores it against rubrics you define — the two systems most teams spend a couple quarters building, and longer maintaining.

The Deal Review agent

Cross-referenceVerifyTagScoreLearn more

Outputs

Deal record
the verified, human-readable Deal Review
Scorecard
scored vs. rubrics
Search index
embedded · vectorized

03 · The Harness

MCP + API ready by default

Not a vector database wired to a chatbot — a harness built for how agents actually need to search: scoped, semantically matched, cited every time.

How have we won deals similar to the Meridian one — what's the winning play?
What's affecting sales execution in EMEA, and how's that impacting win rates?
See the harness

Reachable by any client

ClaudeClaude
ChatGPTChatGPT
SlackSlack
SalesforceSalesforce
HubSpotHubSpot
WorkflowsWorkflows

One place to govern — not a dozen direct connections into raw systems. Tools return cited answers, not data dumps.

Knowledge base

Rubrics, playbooks, and battlecards you already have — plugged in, not rebuilt.

NotionGoogle DriveConfluence

Every deal, scored against the rubric you define — not ours.

Point us at a doc — champion development, discovery quality, pricing fit, whatever your playbook actually measures — and every deal gets reviewed against it automatically, every time it changes.

Deal ReviewMeridian Health
SalesforceGongGmailHindsight
Closed Lost$240K ARR

Exec Summary

Meridian Health selected Frontline by Ormandy over Hindsight despite an active evaluation. The $240K ARR deal was lost primarily due to a perceived integration gap with their existing QuickBooks Online setup and concerns about migration risk. The rep marked loss reason as 'pricing' in Salesforce — buyer interviews revealed integration confidence was the real driver.

Decision Drivers

As % of influence on decision
Integration Confidence: 38%

Buyer cited the absence of a native QuickBooks connector as the deciding factor. Three separate calls referenced it unprompted.

Migration Risk: 24%

Champion flagged the complexity of migrating existing job history. No migration playbook was presented during evaluation.

Incumbent Relationship: 20%

Ormandy had a two-year relationship with the IT lead. Switching cost was perceived as high even before the demo.

Pricing: 10%

Mentioned once in email. CRM recorded this as the primary loss reason — interviews do not support that conclusion.

Other: 8%

Timeline pressure and procurement cycle length contributed marginally.

Scorecard

Configure Rubrics
Product Fit
3/5
Sales Execution
2/5
Relationship Strength
2/5
Pricing Fit
4/5
Competitive Perf.
2/5
Messaging Fit
3/5

Competitors

Frontline by Ormandy

Winner

Selected. Had incumbent advantage and a native QuickBooks integration. Positioning focused on low-friction migration.

Manual processes

Evaluated

Status quo was considered briefly. Dismissed early — not a real competitive threat in this deal.

Features

QuickBooks Integration

Gap3

Buyer required a native connector. Hindsight does not have one — this was the deal's turning point.

Service Workflow Automation

Love2

Buyer was impressed by the automation demo. Not enough to overcome the integration concern.

Job & Project Management

Request2

Buyer asked whether job-level deal tracking was on the roadmap. Rep did not have an answer.

Answers

Configure Prompts

Decision Maker

Persona

IT Decision Maker

Primary Needs

Native integrations with existing finance and operations stack. Low-friction onboarding with minimal disruption to active service workflows. Confidence in vendor support during migration.

Plugs into the models and workflows you use, in a harness that works.

Connect via MCP or API to Claude, OpenAI, and any other agent or tool your team is building. Give everyone the power to retrieve deal context via our proprietary Deal Research harness.

For builders

Point your own agents and internal workflows at the verified record, over MCP or REST — the same scoped tool calls, with user-scoped OAuth and RBAC on every request.

Read the docs →
Claude+Hindsight MCP

Draft a one-pager for the Datafold deal.

Used Hindsight integration · loaded tools
Finding tools
H
select_deal
Datafold
H
select_deal
buyer considered Acme, chose us
H
search_knowledge_base
Acme vs. us · approved one-pagers
Done

Drafted one-pager

Datafold — Why teams choose us over Acme
The gap Acme can't close
Native CI workflow automation, cited from 4 wins.
Proof from comparable wins
6 deals where the buyer evaluated Acme and chose us.
Objection handling: migration risk
Approved rebuttal + the reference that landed it.

Assembled from comparable wins + approved messaging — every claim cited.

The difference between AI you demo, and AI you trust.

Direct reads (Gong / SF)
Hindsight Analyze
Data quality
Raw transcripts + stale fields
Verified, cross-referenced, sourced
Scope per query
One call / record at a time
Synthesis across every deal
Agent cost
Huge token loads of raw text
Scoped tools return answers, not dumps
Trust
No evidence trail
Confidence scores + cited evidence
Output
You build the glue
Any format, CRM write-back, workflows

AI access to your deal data, without the leak risk.

User-scoped OAuth + RBAC on every call, and every call is logged for a full audit trail. Bidirectional, controlled CRM write-back. SOC 2 — see the full trust center for our data-handling and privacy practices.

View the trust center →

Analyze is the engine. The rest runs on it.

Analyze

the engine

The verified record per deal.

Explore Analyze

Compete

arm the rep

Arm reps to win the next deal, in Slack.

Explore Compete

Interviews

proprietary truth

Proprietary buyer truth, fed back into the record.

Explore Interviews

Connect your stack and see what your AI's been missing.